One of the major problems that many educators have with standardized testing is that fact that for a certain period of time in their class, what they are teaching is all about the test. It doesn’t matter if a teacher is in the middle of an amazing string of lessons or teaching and lecturing on something he is passionate about. All that matters for those moments is the test.
In an article that I was reading, Michael J. Crossey, vice president of the Pennsylvania State Education Association, commented on this very topic. He says:
“We need to teach children how to be lifelong learners,” Crossey said. “Teach them how to be successful and how to learn.”
Instead, educators must teach to the test, he said.
The same would be true if the state went to competency testing to graduate from high school, he said.
“To me, one test is never going to meet your needs,” Crossey said, noting that he hasn’t seen the proposed test. “There’s so much more involved than a test.”
Mr. Crossey says a couple important things in this quote. The idea I would like to focus on is the concept of teaching children how to be “lifelong learners”. From my experience as a student and my limited knowledge collected from other Teachers, it seems to me that standardized tests aren’t teaching students how to use their minds, they are merely teaching them how to be good test takers. When I look back on my education I hardly remember anything from the MEAP or ACT or SAT. All that I remember from those tests is how I took them. I learned how to narrow down options in a multiple choice and how to pass the test, not learn some of the material. Of course knowledge of the material is needed in order to succeed, but it can also be argued that students who are knowledgeable in certain subjects may test poorly in those subjects do to poor test taking skills. There are even entire books dedicated to studying for tests, the “test prep” book section is not an uncommon site at any Barnes and Noble.
So as I reflect on this article and my test memories I wonder, “What’s the point?” When am I ever going to use those test taking skills in the real world. I doubt I will and I doubt whether any of my fellow students will. So why do we keep bombarding students with this format of learning if it really isn’t beneficial to them in the long run. I feel that there have to be other ways of enabling our students to become better life long learners. What if we taught them things that mattered in each subject instead of how to successfully pass a test. I know that I don’t have the experience or the knowledge to propose a better plan, but I feel there must be one out there. There has to be a better alternative to standardized test.
I would like to say something, for myself and my readers, regarding me and this topic. It is the fact that I am extremely uninformed on this subject. I have my general opinion in regards to standardized testing, but I am willing to hear both sides of the argument. Perhaps there are some benefits to testing, I would like to find out so that maybe a better way of evaluating students could be discovered. I may not know it all but one fact that I am getting from my readings is that there is a certain amount of unrest among practicing teachers in regards to this testing system.
So hopefully through this class and these blogs I can discover just a little bit more about what it means to be an educator. If anyone out there has any information that could send me in the right direction it would be greatly appreciated.
– Link
2 responses so far ↓
1
Mike Wise
// Sep 25, 2007 at 12:59 am
Yes! I hate to sound redundant, because I posted on Walter’s blog a very similar thing that I am going to post here, but I feel very strongly about this. I think the SAT should be abolished. It is silly to make kids learn things in classrooms simply to be able to churn out the info on a multiple choice exam. In fact, while I’m at it, multiple choice exams should be thrown out altogether. Honestly, I always learned much more about what I knew when I had to write an essay or at least short answer questions. Along with what you said, getting rid of these huge standardized tests will make way for real lesson plans and real curriculum. Thought I’d throw my two cents in. Hey, check out my blog. If this interested you, you may be interested in my latest post.
2
Jana
// Sep 25, 2007 at 11:13 pm
When I was in school, and I’d get stuch on a question on the test, my teachers advised me to fill in the answer. This was because the likelihood of getting the answer right if I guessed randomly was better than if I left the answer blank. So, if I got stuck, or if I ran out of time and had a bunch of questions left, I just filled in the bubbles on the scantron so that the filled in circles made patterns and pictures. ABACADABA was a favorite pattern of mine.I don’t think I really learned much by taking those standardized tests. It’s funny that all the time that the counselor spent “preparing” us for the test, and the time that the teacher apparently spent building his/ her curriculum around the test specifically, and one of the most valuable lessons I learned was how much these tests didn’t accurately measure what I know, or not know. Like Rozema, I am a fan of authentic assignments and assessments.
Leave a Comment